supereasymode:

professordris:

stfumarrieds:


robot-heart-politics:
downlo:


Maggie Goes on A Diet by Paul Kramer, is due for  publication in the US in October but is already listed on many  bookseller’s websites. The book tells the story of 14-year-old Maggie  who “is transformed from being extremely overweight and insecure to a  normal-sized girl who becomes the school football star”. “Through time,  exercise and hard work, Maggie becomes more and more confident and  develops a positive self-image,” it adds.

Really? Really?

Because Maggie obviously can’t develop confidence and a positive self-image until she’s “normal”-sized!

The comments at the original article are vom-worthy. Fattism and sexism: alive and well the world over. Remember ladies, no one will ever love you unless you’re thin and beautiful. Even ugly chaps want nothing to do with chubbies. Your chance of engaging in FB schmoopiness declines exponentially with each pound you gain. 
ETA: Here’s the publisher’s website: http://www.alohapublishers.com/. Feel free to contact them to register your dismay and urge them not to publish this, for lack of a better word, book. 

Not seeing the big deal… Obesity is a serious problem, and some people DO need to stop building this idea of a “positive body image” when they’re extremely overweight. It’s not helping them at all. (I can say this cuz I used to be 215 lbs, and it sucked. I was really insecure about it, and developing a positive body image wouldn’t help me get healthy, it would just make me comfortable with being overweight, which isn’t good. Then, I lost a lot of weight, and I feel a lot better about myself.)

I agree with Idris on this completely. The description of the book is literally the most wholesome one that I have ever read. “Through time, hard work, and exercise, Maggie becomes more and more confident and develops a positive self-image.” Doesn’t exactly scream “fattist” or sexist to me. Do you remember back in the ’90s when everyone was encouraged to be themselves and love themselves the way they are? That was a great message back in a time when kids were still socially and physically active and didn’t have so many many distractions in the form of personalized technology and the internet. BUT we live in a much different time now and people NEED to face the reality that obesity is a serious health concern and is one that appears in children at an alarming rate. Furthermore, this book, if the description is any indication of its contents and quality, is a prime example that encouraging kids to be active and healthy =/= being sexist nor is it aimed at debilitating a child’s self-esteem. It merely encourages kids that being healthy should be a priority for everyone. Nobody cries foul when Michelle Obama tells kids to stay active, and nobody should when this book is released. 

^ Kind of agree. Can’t say for sure if it’s got a good or bad message unless I’ve read it, but if it’s just encouraging being healthy? How is that a problem?
I think that the title being “Maggie Goes on a Diet” is probably the most off-putting thing; its purpose would be better served if it was, like, “Maggie Exercises” or something. Also, the cover is reminiscent of all the anorexia pictures of a deathly thin girl looking into a mirror and seeing an overweight girl (although in reverse). But the message, “exercise and eat healthily” is not at all something to get mad about. Being super overweight simply because you don’t exercise or eat well is not something that is “okay” for kids to be. Obviously, don’t make them feel bad about it (“You’re so fat! Gross! Lose weight!”) but I can imagine this being a helpful book for kids whose doctors put them on a diet, for example.
I’m not saying that if you’re overweight you’re not beautiful or automatically have self-esteem problems, but I am saying that child obesity is a super serious problem. I’m not okay with making kids “love themselves for who they are” to the point where it’s actually damaging their health.
Also, how is this sexist? Because she’s a girl who needs to lose weight? Because she’s holding up a pink dress? THAT IS NOT SEXIST HOLY FUCK THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH GIRLS WEARING PINK DRESSES
* SHE’S NOT DOING IT TO GET A BOY. That would be sexist, okay. But she’s the one who becomes the soccer star afskjaflkafkljafs.

supereasymode:

professordris:

stfumarrieds:

robot-heart-politics:

downlo:

Maggie Goes on A Diet by Paul Kramer, is due for publication in the US in October but is already listed on many bookseller’s websites. The book tells the story of 14-year-old Maggie who “is transformed from being extremely overweight and insecure to a normal-sized girl who becomes the school football star”. “Through time, exercise and hard work, Maggie becomes more and more confident and develops a positive self-image,” it adds.

Really? Really?

Because Maggie obviously can’t develop confidence and a positive self-image until she’s “normal”-sized!

The comments at the original article are vom-worthy. Fattism and sexism: alive and well the world over. Remember ladies, no one will ever love you unless you’re thin and beautiful. Even ugly chaps want nothing to do with chubbies. Your chance of engaging in FB schmoopiness declines exponentially with each pound you gain. 

ETA: Here’s the publisher’s website: http://www.alohapublishers.com/. Feel free to contact them to register your dismay and urge them not to publish this, for lack of a better word, book. 

Not seeing the big deal… Obesity is a serious problem, and some people DO need to stop building this idea of a “positive body image” when they’re extremely overweight. It’s not helping them at all. (I can say this cuz I used to be 215 lbs, and it sucked. I was really insecure about it, and developing a positive body image wouldn’t help me get healthy, it would just make me comfortable with being overweight, which isn’t good. Then, I lost a lot of weight, and I feel a lot better about myself.)

I agree with Idris on this completely. The description of the book is literally the most wholesome one that I have ever read. “Through time, hard work, and exercise, Maggie becomes more and more confident and develops a positive self-image.” Doesn’t exactly scream “fattist” or sexist to me. Do you remember back in the ’90s when everyone was encouraged to be themselves and love themselves the way they are? That was a great message back in a time when kids were still socially and physically active and didn’t have so many many distractions in the form of personalized technology and the internet. BUT we live in a much different time now and people NEED to face the reality that obesity is a serious health concern and is one that appears in children at an alarming rate. Furthermore, this book, if the description is any indication of its contents and quality, is a prime example that encouraging kids to be active and healthy =/= being sexist nor is it aimed at debilitating a child’s self-esteem. It merely encourages kids that being healthy should be a priority for everyone. Nobody cries foul when Michelle Obama tells kids to stay active, and nobody should when this book is released. 

^ Kind of agree. Can’t say for sure if it’s got a good or bad message unless I’ve read it, but if it’s just encouraging being healthy? How is that a problem?

I think that the title being “Maggie Goes on a Diet” is probably the most off-putting thing; its purpose would be better served if it was, like, “Maggie Exercises” or something. Also, the cover is reminiscent of all the anorexia pictures of a deathly thin girl looking into a mirror and seeing an overweight girl (although in reverse). But the message, “exercise and eat healthily” is not at all something to get mad about. Being super overweight simply because you don’t exercise or eat well is not something that is “okay” for kids to be. Obviously, don’t make them feel bad about it (“You’re so fat! Gross! Lose weight!”) but I can imagine this being a helpful book for kids whose doctors put them on a diet, for example.

I’m not saying that if you’re overweight you’re not beautiful or automatically have self-esteem problems, but I am saying that child obesity is a super serious problem. I’m not okay with making kids “love themselves for who they are” to the point where it’s actually damaging their health.

Also, how is this sexist? Because she’s a girl who needs to lose weight? Because she’s holding up a pink dress? THAT IS NOT SEXIST HOLY FUCK THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH GIRLS WEARING PINK DRESSES

* SHE’S NOT DOING IT TO GET A BOY. That would be sexist, okay. But she’s the one who becomes the soccer star afskjaflkafkljafs.

  1. nowherezone11 reblogged this from thankyoubasedsantorum and added:
    oh gee this is going to be such a fun fucking fucked-up video game for my child T-T FUCK U!!!!!
  2. pokemei reblogged this from feministmedia
  3. ginalouise reblogged this from downlo and added:
    What the fuckety fuck?
  4. anotherfeminist reblogged this from feministmedia
  5. lovelylittlesailor reblogged this from kaleidoscopemeansiloveyou and added:
    LAWLZ@ The illustrationz, the cover page is killing me. Both points are valid, where the book description seems bad,...
  6. chiben reblogged this from kaleidoscopemeansiloveyou and added:
    wth where can i buy this book lol
  7. kaleidoscopemeansiloveyou reblogged this from bowfolk and added:
    Okay so this isn’t looking too good, but maybe we should read the book first? I hate to use the old saying at a time...
  8. peppers-pray reblogged this from adventuresofcomicbookgirl and added:
    D: *look of horror* This is real? *wince* oh society, why must you suck?
  9. barackattack reblogged this from thesunfloweramazon
  10. shithive reblogged this from bowfolk
  11. thesunfloweramazon reblogged this from adventuresofcomicbookgirl and added:
    Okay. Opinions. I read an interview with the man who wrote it. I totally understand his reasons for writing it: When he...
  12. merrymae reblogged this from adventuresofcomicbookgirl and added:
    What the everloving fuck
  13. scottishdreamergirl reblogged this from adventuresofcomicbookgirl and added:
    …Yeah, I’m going to have to agree with the above. Here’s a confesion, my awesome tumblr peeps, I am fat. Have been...
  14. adventuresofcomicbookgirl reblogged this from bowfolk and added:
    trauma warning fatphobia...this is reeeeeeeeally gross. Weight loss should not be sold to...
  15. blojo reblogged this from findalaska and added:
    This, also. Nowhere do I get from the picture or the summary that this book is sexist. If that girl wants to wear a pink...
  16. eastfaggotnowhere reblogged this from ursweetdestiny
  17. otarsus reblogged this from golden-notebook and added:
    Author Paul Kramer was interviewed on Good Morning America and could only give bullshit answers and trite phrases like...
  18. centermind reblogged this from blueemeralds27
  19. blueemeralds27 reblogged this from nessfraserloves
  20. thenewwomensmovement reblogged this from iamthecrime
  21. pixieeve reblogged this from shreddedleftshoe and added:
    Obesity is a problem, a complex problem involving a number of social, economic,
  22. findalaska reblogged this from supereasymode and added:
    ^ Kind of agree. Can’t say for sure if it’s got a good or bad message unless I’ve read it, but if it’s just encouraging...
  23. supereasymode reblogged this from shreddedleftshoe and added:
    I agree with Idris on this completely. The description of the book is literally the most wholesome one that I have ever...
  24. qotumblr reblogged this from jhameia and added:
    You know what might really help Maggie develop positive self-image? Not living in a fucking world where shit like this...
  25. holden421 reblogged this from kasprik and added:
    Umm why the he’ll is being over weight acceptable. More kids than ever before suffer from early onset diabetes but it’s...